Substrate

A living collection of notes, ideas, and reflections from Doug Belshaw.

reflections updated

Half my life

Today, my wife Hannah and I celebrate our 23rd wedding anniversary – meaning we've been married for more than half our lives ❤️

Although she hasn't retained the accent, Hannah is originally from Liverpool, so it feels appropriate to quote the ending theme song from Surprise Surprise featuring famous Scouser, the one and only Cilla Black:

…
notes

An inner architecture

This is why Aristotle thought that you can't judge whether a man was "happy" until after he's dead. And sometimes until long after he's died, because it would depend on the actions of, say, his offspring (which would reflect the way he helped raise them).

…
ideas updated

Legibility at the boundary

This morning, the slowly-moving car crash that is my method of thinking things through served up an idea related to a previous note about consequences and boundaries.

Essentially, when we're talking about boundaries we're talking about legibility which is an important component of literacy. Literate practices involve encoding and decoding texts, and sit within an existing power dynamic. There are many forms of literate practices, which as I will keep repeating until I'm blue in the face, are dependent upon literate communities.

…
notes updated

Living an NPC life

A few years ago, it was fashionable among the youth, including my son, to refer to people as "NPCs" or "Non-Player Characters". As Wikipedia explains:

A non-player character (NPC) is a character in a game that is not controlled by a player. The term originated in traditional tabletop role-playing games where it applies to characters controlled by the gamemaster, or referee, rather than by another player. In video games, this term usually means a computer-controlled character that has a predetermined set of behaviors that potentially will impact gameplay.

…
reflections updated

Consequences have boundaries

I’ve just realised that yesterday’s post about consequentialism is closely related to something I studied as part of my postgraduate Systems Thinking qualification: Critical Systems Heuristics, or CSH. The 2x2 grid I shared in that post was a way of resisting the lazy claim that a system is justified merely because it “works”. CSH provides a more disciplined way to ask what is hidden behind that claim.

…